The Da Vinci Codeine
Having just got out of the cinema, I’m glad to report here that the year’s most highy anticipated movie, The Da Vinci Code, is an excellent film, and I highly recommend it to everyone who has sleeping disorders, because at RM12 a ticket, it is WAY cheaper than sleeping pills. Better yet, get the DVD, set the player on repeat and it’s goodbye insomnia.
PS: Fuckstress, take note.
PPS: Our Film Censorship Board (Motto: We watch the naughty bits so you don’t have to) let the film through intact, with absolutely no cuts. Apparently, the idea of Jesus bonking Mary M is less offensive than say, a caricature of Prophet Muhammad.
May 19th, 2006 at 11:42 am
bonking? I’m booking tickets now.
May 19th, 2006 at 11:54 am
If you liked the movie, may I know how you found the book?
May 19th, 2006 at 1:44 pm
BONKING? nice.
May 19th, 2006 at 1:58 pm
Not surprised, really. Too much hype surrounding the film adaptation of an already contentious book. As it is, the film stays true to the book, and so those having already read the book would probably find the film a bore – been there, done that kinda thing.
I’m just reading the book now (haven’t finished it), and do intend to see the film, regardless of what the critics say.
Surprisingly the film made it thru totally intact – I hope this is a trend that will continue. Unless, of course, a certain Akmal Abdullah has his say…
May 19th, 2006 at 2:20 pm
Haven’t read the book, haven’t seen the movie but will watch it when the hype die down and with lower ticket prices.
Since when did cinemas charge extra for new movies? I first noticed this during King Kong. -____-
May 19th, 2006 at 3:34 pm
Bonking? Did I just read ‘Bonking’???
May 19th, 2006 at 3:54 pm
ron, FA, arth akal: The IDEA guys, IDEA as in CONCEPT, as in what the entire premise of the movie is based on. No real hot on-screen action, sorry.
But wait till the porno version comes out — “The Da Vinci Load”– which I bet will be at least 500 times more exciting than watching Tom Hanks running around for 2.5 hours looking as grave and concerned as plywood. I mean, they could have saved 20 million bucks and hired Steven Seagal as Langdon instead and no one in the audience would’ve noticed. Because they’d all be asleep.
walski69: Even more surprising, is that no angry Christian fundamentalists have called for the murder of the Director of the Film Censorship Board for allowing cinemas to screen such “blasphemy”.
emily: You can save quite a bit if you go for shows before 12pm, they’re RM6 weekdays, even on new releases. Prices are up because they include an extra 30 minutes of commercials before the show starts — amazing value for only RM2 extra, don’t you think?
CSC: I liked the book better. At least I could take toilet breaks between chapters.
May 19th, 2006 at 7:50 pm
OI! now what am I gonna do with the tickets… ?
May 22nd, 2006 at 8:19 pm
Lol, I didn’t think the movie was that bad. Yeah, it wasn’t as great as the book (very few movies adapted from books are, so people should just stop expecting it to be
), but I didn’t think anyone WOULD fall asleep watching it. 
May 23rd, 2006 at 2:56 pm
Kurtlow, may I recommend ‘Behold the Man’ by Michael Moorcock? I wonder what your reaction would be as with regards to the depiction of Christ. Heh. Just curious merely.
May 28th, 2006 at 3:57 am
Watch your language… Just watch the movie without ridicule it further. Don’t do stupid stunt to gain publicity.
June 1st, 2006 at 9:05 am
“Our Film Censorship Board (Motto: We watch the naughty bits so you don’t have to) let the film through intact, with absolutely no cuts. Apparently, the idea of Jesus bonking Mary M is less offensive than say, a caricature of Prophet Muhammad. ”
It’s certainly double standards.